Thirteen Days Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Thirteen Days - Movie Review Example The pressures mounted on him to authorize 'the only option' to execute air strike which could possibly lead to more catastrophes. And yet, despite more pressures the Kennedy administration was facing, he remained calm with absolute willingness to maintain world peace by not engaging in a war that could possibly lead to another world war. John F. Kennedy is the man with deep sense of duty and responsibility. This experience was crucial for America, there was a threat that was about to happen after thirteen days and yet, he had to decide what could bring more benefit to all. Of course, air strike would not be the best option for another war is at stake. It is not easy for Kennedy, as played by Bruce Greenwoods, to do decision or strategy to pressure Soviet Union to pull out their military build up because, that would lead to world war III. The film presented America's readiness for possible war; they were equipped with military weapons, and their personnel were dedicated and well-trained. And yet, despite these, Kennedy was very careful not to fire a single weapon to avoid larger war. These were shown in many instances which only proved that Kennedy respected the human rights and the law. President John F. Kennedy exemplified the character of a wise man mentioned in the book of Proverbs in the Bible - a virtuous man. Amid the pressures from his top military leaders demanding air strikes and the consistent reports of the progress of Soviet military presence threatening the world with their nuclear prowess, John F. Kennedy stood firm not to engage in aggression but exploit all possible democratic options that may lead to settlement of the situation. While top military officers saw air strikes as the only solution, he empowered his own men for back door negotiations for the sake of much greater benefits, despite of stubborn impression he is seemingly showing his military officers. The film also presents different virtues of Kennedy's men; there were those who sympathized with his idea that pursued his step-by-step instruction. While others saw only one solution, some were still heed to what the President stood for. These men stood beside the president. It is a good film which shows that America during that period resisted offensive war against another country; the success that they had seen was when the Soviet Union pull out their military weapon from Cuba. From this stand point, we can say that Kennedy and his other men including Kenneth P. O'Donnell (as played by Kevin Costner), his brother Bobby (played by Steven Culp), and other cabinet members such as the National Defense Secretary, the Ambassador for the United Nations, and others, were on in terms of maintaining world peace. They have what we call the duty triangle which are needed by anybody especially those who are in high positions when making tough decisions. Specifically the President of the United States presented the three sides of the character such as virtue, principles and consequence. He is an example of a leader who believes in the duty triangle that made him took a careful step that benefited everyone; this could be one of the possible reasons why cold war between these two world great power ended not causing any harm in the world. John F. Kennedy is a virtuous man as opposed to the propaganda of the Soviet that he was weak. He possesses good moral

Cons of Cosmetic Animal Testing Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Cons of Cosmetic Animal Testing - Assignment Example nt victory for both animal rights activists and the very animals, the European Union (EU) in March 2013 (The EU Animal Testing Ban, n.d.), imposed a ban on the sale of cosmetics and/or cosmetic ingredients used in animal testing (Cosmetics and Household-Product Animal Testing, n.d.). That marketing ban meant that companies who intended to trade within the EU, the world over, had no choice but to abandon cosmetic animal testing. The European Union further pointed to the abolishment of all activities relating to testing of products and ingredients that are acquired or sold within the EU. However, interested firms can continue carrying on animal experiments provided they are outside the EU and the products used are not sold within the EU. However, it is not easy for such firms to sell products in the global market due to various restrictions imposed by other countries. For instance, the Chinese government demands samples for a variety of thorough animal tests before allowing any sales i n China. Prior to that decision, there were numerous protests vented by People for The Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) activists through emails, public protests and phone calls. Through PETA’s scientific expertise and funding, China is also making enormous strides in steering away from cosmetic animal testing and will soon approve non-animal tests to replace cosmetic tests. In the same spirit of conservation, Israel and India have also banned the practice. The ban imposed by the Indian government is temporary, but there are measures to establish a permanent one. In a contrasting scenario, the United States have not taken the same steps. It is unbelievable that researchers persist with animal experiments for cosmetics despite the presence of reliable non-animal tests. Recently, research experts have proven that manufacturers can use 3-D human cell generated tissues to measure how long a chemical takes to burn the rabbit eye’s cornea. The chemical is dropped by the researchers